The Association Between Hypertension Treatment, Control, and Functional Status

Published In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, v. 2, no. 6, Nov.-Dec. 1987, p. 406-410

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1987

by David S. Siscovick, David S. Strogatz, Suzanne W. Fletcher, Barbara Leake, Robert H. Brook

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.springerlink.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The authors examined the relationship between hypertension treatment, control, and functional status among 356 uncomplicated hypertensive patients receiving care in 16 teaching hospital group practices. Antihypertensive drug therapy and blood pressure control were determined from a medical record review. Functional status (health perceptions, mental health, role, and physical functioning) was assessed with a questionnaire. After adjustment for potential confounders, hypertensive patients without drug therapy were less likely to have impairment in mental health functioning, compared with patients receiving one or more than one antihypertensive medication (9% versus 25% and 20% respectively, p less than 0.05). However, uncontrolled hypertensive patients were more likely to have role limitations than patients controlled only at the end or throughout the record review period (51% versus 39% and 36%, respectively, p less than 0.05). Patients controlled throughout the review period had the least impairment for each measure of functional status. These preliminary findings suggest that pharmacologic therapy may have a negative influence on the mental health of uncomplicated hypertensive patients, but that the dual goals of blood pressure control and positive functional status are not incompatible.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.