The Use and Misuse of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Published in: Annals of Internal Medicine, v. 109, no. 8, Oct. 15, 1988, p. 664-670

Posted on on January 01, 1988

by Katherine L. Kahn, Jacqueline Kosecoff, Mark R. Chassin, David Solomon, Robert H. Brook

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine how appropriately physicians in 1981 did upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a randomly selected, community-based sample of Medicare patients. DESIGN: The authors developed a comprehensive and clinically detailed list of 1069 indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. A national panel of nine clinicians rated the appropriateness of the indications. They categorized the indications as appropriate, inappropriate, or equivocal. The authors did a clinically detailed medical record review of a random sample of 1585 patients having upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to assess the appropriateness of using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. SETTING: Patients were sampled from large geographic areas in three states. Two areas represented high use, and one area, low use. PATIENTS: Random sample of patients 65 years of age or older receiving diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: None; the study was retrospective. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: Patient characteristics, histories, and clinical indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were similar across low- and high-use areas. Overall, 72% of the endoscopies were done for appropriate indications, 11% for equivocal indications, and 17% for inappropriate indications. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (26%), follow-up to an abnormal upper gastrointestinal series (21%), dysphagia (18%), and dyspepsia (15%) were the most frequent clinical reasons for doing endoscopy. Inpatient endoscopies were more often appropriate and less often inappropriate than outpatient endoscopies. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of practice patterns among study sites provides the clinical basis for understanding the use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The finding of 17% inappropriate use may be cause for concern.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.