Admission Source to the Medical Intensive Care Unit Predicts Hospital Death Independent of APACHE II Score

Published in: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association, v. 264, no. 18, Nov. 14, 1990, p. 2389-2394

Posted on on January 01, 1990

by Jose J. Escarce, Mark A. Kelley

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This study was conducted to determine if the source of admission to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) is associated with hospital death independent of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score. The authors calculated APACHE II scores and predicted risks of hospital death of 235 patients who were admitted to the MICU. The predicted death rate was the same as the actual rate for patients who were admitted directly from the emergency department (25% vs. 22%), but was less than the actual rate for patients who were transferred from hospital floors (38% vs. 55%), the medical intermediate care unit (323% vs. 59%), and other hospitals (21% vs. 36%). Logistic regression analysis confirmed an independent association between the MICU admission source and risk of death. The authors' findings suggest that APACHE II does not measure illness severity accurately in all patients who are admitted to intensive care units. If their results are generalizable, using APACHE II to compare intensive care outcomes among hospitals could lead to wrong conclusions about quality of care. Improving predictions of hospital death rates among patients who are in MICUs may require the inclusion of new types of information in the classification system.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.