The following article examines the difficulty of establishing a philosophy of chiropractic for a college that has enough consistency, coherence and integration throughout the curriculum to constitute a body of knowledge. It proposes a consensus model for developing such a paradigm based on faculty debate and input. The report then examines two attempts to achieve this at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College and the Los Angeles College of Chiropractic. From this work the major traditional tenets of chiropractic have been identified. This consists of at least five distinct philosophies: vitalism, holism, naturalism, conservatism and critical rationalism. From these is derived a distinct chiropractic paradigm of health and health care. The paper then examines the implications of these for a curriculum.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.