Emerging Parallels in the American Health Care and Legal-Judicial Systems

Published In: American Journal of Law and Medicine, v. XVIII, 1 and 2, 1992, p. 73-96

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1992

by David Hadorn

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.aslme.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Deals with the problems of discrimination when health care priorities are set, by examining parallels in the American health care system and the legal-judicial system. It suggests that, by defining legitimate health care needs, society can eliminate the need to ration necessary care. Such needs can be defined using carefully developed coverage rules, rather than the informal rules currently in place, in conjunction with the already-existing due-process methods for interpreting and implementing those rules. This work could become a basis for cooperative studies between RAND's Institute for Civil Justice and RAND Health.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.