Appropriateness

The Next Frontier

Published in: British Medical Journal, v. 308, 1994, p. 218-219

by Robert H. Brook

Argues that health care systems of developed countries share common problems, including an explosion of costly medical technologies. The rapid increase in the number and sophistication of these technologies has jeopardized the ability to provide care to all potential beneficiaries, and it has also made it almost impossible to keep track of the indications, complications, and costs of procedures and drugs (i.e., to practice good medicine without additional input). This article presents a potential solution to both of these problems--the explicit measurement of appropriateness of care--and describes a method by which appropriateness of care could be measured.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.