How Age, Outcome Severity, and Scale Influence General Medicine Clinic Patients' Interpretations of Verbal Probability Terms

Published In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, v. 9, no. 5, May 1994, p. 268-271

Posted on on January 01, 1994

by Dennis J. Mazur, Jon Merz

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

It is becoming fashionable in medicine to provide patients with an estimate of the risk of techniques or procedures to try to elicit patient preferences prior to the therapy or procedure. Very often the physician will provide the patient with a verbal probability (for example, using the word rare to describe risk of death from anesthesia or severe pneumonia following a procedure). This article describes how age, type of scale used, and outcome severity influence patients' interpretations of verbal probability terms. The study was based in a Department of Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, and subjects included 210 patients seen consecutively in a general medicine clinic. Patients were provided with a long or a short form that gave probability estimates of a complication (death from anesthesia, severe pneumonia) occurring. All probabilities were given in steps of 10; the long form ranged from 100 out of 100 to 1 out of 1,000,000, and the short form ranged from 100 out of 100 to 1 out of 1,000. Patients were randomized to the type of scale and complication described. Results indicated that the type of scale as well as the type of complication influenced what people thought rare meant. The investigators concluded that more-quantitative estimates may be needed when information is given to patients about complications from surgical procedures.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.