The Appropriateness of Use of Cardiovascular Procedures in Women and Men

Published In: Archives of Internal Medicine, v. 154, no. 23, Dec 12-26 1994, p. 2759-2765

by Steven J. Bernstein, Lee H. Hilborne, Lucian L. Leape, Rolla Edward Park, Robert H. Brook

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

A great deal of concern exists that women receive fewer revascularization procedures than men, and that this may represent discrimination against women. This article examines whether there are differences between men and women in the appropriateness of cardiovascular procedures (coronary angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery). The study was based on data obtained from a random sample of over 4,000 patients in 30 hospitals in New York State. Analyses were conducted using both the RAND appropriateness method and the Duke Prognostic Exercise Treadmill Score. The article concludes that the inappropriate use of cardiovascular procedures was low and not significantly different between men and women. In addition, the use of these procedures for uncertain or equivocal reasons did not vary significantly by gender. There was also no significant gender difference in the predicted risk of death from a cardiovascular event for coronary angiography patients. The analysis reported in this article is particularly strong and valid because the study uses two different methodologies to indicate that there may not be a gender bias in the use of these three cardiovascular procedures in hospital settings.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.