Prediction of Visual Function After Cataract Surgery

A Prospectively Validated Model

Published In: Archives of Ophthalmology, v. 113, no. 10, Oct. 1995, p. 1305-1311

Posted on on January 01, 1995

by Carol Mangione, E. John Orav, Mary G. Lawrence, Russell S. Phillips, Johanna M. Seddon, Lee Goldman

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Presents a model for predicting visual functional improvement after cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation, based on preoperative data. The study included serial evaluations of visual function preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months post- surgery. Results indicated that 40 percent of the patients had substantial, and 19 percent had some, improvement postoperatively, as measured by the Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS). Predictors of improvement included younger age, poorer preoperative ADVS score, posterior subcapsular cataract, and absence of age-related macular degeneration and/or diabetes. When applied to an independent sample of patients, these five predictors classified the patients into three groups in which the probabilities of substantial improvement were 85, 34, and 3 percent, thus verifying the discriminatory power of the prediction rule. The authors conclude that a scale such as the ADVS can be used in combination with preoperative clinical factors to identify patients preoperatively who are likely to benefit from cataract surgery.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.