Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Older and Demented Populations

Published In: Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, Second Ed. / Bert Spilker, Ed. (Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996) Chapter 86, p. 819-830

Posted on on January 01, 1995

by Anita Stewart, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Meryl Brod

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Presents issues that should be considered when assessing the quality of life of older persons, particularly those with dementia. The authors suggest, for example, that it is important to distinguish between physical functioning and self-care and self-maintenance activities among these populations. In addition, depression and sleep disorders should be examined, and direct assessments should be short to allow for reduced attention spans. Research is needed to understand the bias and measurement error that may be introduced by the use of proxies in older and demented populations. The reliability and validity of existing HRQOL measures should be assessed and reported. The authors recommend that quality-of-life studies in these patients routinely incorporate at least one basic methodological question (e.g., validity test of a particular measure in relation to another measure or to clinical status) so that refinements can be made in instruments with poor psychometric characteristics. If researchers who use quality-of-life measures could be persuaded to be part of such an undertaking, a great deal of information across multiple studies would be obtained and the psychometric properties of HRQOL measures would be greatly improved.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.