Overuse of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in a Country with Open-Access Endoscopy

A Prospective Study in Primary Care

Published in: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, v. 45, no. 1, Jan. 1997, p. 13-19

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1997

by Florian Froehlich, Bernard Burnand, Isabelle Pache, John Paul Vader, Michael Fried, Catherine Schneider, Jacqueline Kosecoff, Marvin Kolodny, Robert W. Dubois, Robert H. Brook, et al.

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.blackwell-synergy.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Reports the results of a prospective observational study aimed at evaluating the appropriateness of use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) in primary care in a country with open access to, and high availability of, the procedure. Outpatients were consecutively included in two clinical settings, both in Switzerland, which consisted of either a university-based outpatient clinic or primary care physicians' offices. Appropriateness was judged by explicit Swiss criteria developed by the RAND/UCLA panel method. Of over 8,000 patients who presented to these offices, about 600 had upper GI symptoms. Physicians decided to perform upper GI endoscopy in 63 of these patients. Of these 63 procedures, 40% were rated appropriate, 11% equivocal, and 49% inappropriate. The decision to perform UGE in previously untreated dyspeptic patients was the most common clinical situation resulting in overuse. This article concluded that overuse of UGE is high in Switzerland and needs to be reduced.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.