Rebuttal to David Mage's Comments on "A Quantitative Definition of Exposure and Related Concepts," Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 7 (4):411-438

Published in: Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, v. 8, no. 2, 1998, p. 123-128

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1998

by V. G. Zartarian, Wayne Ott, Naihua Duan

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.nature.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The authors respond to David Mage's comments on their article, which discussed development of a conceptual framework for exposure and related concepts that can be used by members of the International Society of Exposure Analysis and others for improved communication.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.