Variation in Surgical Opinion Regarding Management of Selected Cervical Spine Injuries

A Preliminary Study

Published in: Spine, v. 23, no. 9, May 1998

Posted on on January 01, 1998

by John A. Glaser, Beth Jaworski, Brian G. Cuddy, Todd J. Albert, James P. Hollowell, Robert F. McLain, Samuel A. Bozzette

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The opinions of orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons were compared regarding appropriate management of selected cervical injuries and the timing of stabilization in order to determine whether there is consistency of opinion regarding the management of cervical trauma. The study found that there is a large variety of opinion regarding appropriateness of specific operative and nonoperative management procedures and surgical timing among the surgeons polled who manage cervical trauma. This implies that there is no widely accepted standard of management procedure for many of these injuries.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.