Clinical Reasoning, Clinical Decision Analysis, and Clinical Intuition

The Think No Evil, Do No Evil, Know No Evil of Clinical Practice?

Published in: Topics in Clinical Chiropractic, v. 5, no. 2, June 1998, p. 27-33

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1998

by Ian D. Coulter

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.chiro-online.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

During the last 30 years much work has been done in the health professions to understand and teach clinical decision making. This article examines the lessons learned from a chiropractic perspective. A review of the literature is presented that delineates what is known about three aspects of clinical thinking, namely clinical reasoning, decision analysis, and intuition in clinical practice. While formal, quantitative research methods have greatly expanded understanding of clinical reasoning, and decision analysis has provided a method for improving clinical reasoning, tacit knowledge or intuition is also important. Rather than providing a replacement for intuition, the research provides support for the significance of its role, and indirect support for its efficiency. Knowledge and experience are integral processes and crucial to good clinical decision making. This finding poses a challenge to chiropractic education, which is at a disadvantage when it comes to providing clinical experience to its students.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.