What Type of Information Is Needed to Inform Mental Health Policy?

Published in: Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, v. 2, 1999, p. 141-144

Posted on RAND.org on December 31, 1998

by Roland Sturm

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.icmpe.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The most valuable research integrates information from three levels of investigation: clinical efficacy, real life effectiveness (including cost-effectiveness) and policy research. Successful applications of systematic reviews have largely been limited to clinical efficacy questions. The contribution of systematic reviews/meta-analyses to effectiveness and economic questions in mental health has been very minor and their contribution to inform policy is negligible. The latter is unlikely to change due to the different type of information that policy makers need.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.