Underuse and Overuse of Diagnostic Testing for Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Presenting with New-Onset Chest Pain

Published in: American Journal of Medicine, v. 106, no. 4, Apr. 1999, p. 391-398

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1999

by David Carlisle, Lucian L. Leape, Steven Bickel, Robert M. Bell, Caren Kamberg, Barbara Genovese, William J. French, Vidya S. Kaushik, Peter R. Mahrer, Myrvin H. Ellestad, et al.

Read More

Access further information on this document at American Journal of Medicine

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of overuse and underuse of diagnostic testing for coronary artery disease and to determine whether the socioeconomic status, health insurance, gender, and race/ethnicity of a patient influence the use of diagnostic tests. The authors identified patients who presented with new-onset chest pain not due to myocardial infarction at one of five Los Angeles-area hospital emergency departments between October 1994 and April 1996. Explicit criteria for diagnostic testing were developed using the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, expert panel method. They were applied to data collected by medical record review and patient questionnaire. Of the 356 patients, 181 met necessity criteria for diagnostic cardiac testing. Of these, 40 failed to receive necessary tests. Only 7 of the 215 patients who received some form of cardiac testing had tests that were judged to be inappropriate. Underuse was significantly more common in patients with only a high school education and those without health insurance. In a multivariate logistic regression model, only the lack of a post-high school education was a significant predictor of underuse. The authors conclude that among patients with new-onset crest pain, underuse of diagnostic testing for coronary artery disease was much more common than overuse. Underuse was primarily associated with lower levels of patient education.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.