Researching Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation

A Coded Review of Studies

Published In: T. Thorsen and M. Makela Eds. Changing Professional Practice: Theory and Practice of Clinical Guidelines Implementation (Copenhagen, DK: Danish Institute For Health Services Research and Development, 1999), DSI Rapport 99.05, Chapter 9, p. 169-190

Posted on on January 01, 1999

by H. C. Pagliari, James P. Kahan

Aims of the chapter: - To provide a bibliographic review of research on perceived or attitudinal barriers and facilitators to implementation. - To identify studies which have used structured instruments to investigate these variables. - To categorise the studies listed in the bibliography in such a way as to facilitate the identification of appropriate instrument for future projects.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.