Care of Vaginal Symptoms Among HIV-infected Women

Published in: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, v. 25, no. 1, Sep. 1, 2000, p. 51-55

Posted on on January 01, 2000

by Michael Stein, William Cunningham, Terry T. Nakazono, Steven M. Asch, Barbara J. Turner, Stephen Crystal, Ronald Andersen, Sally Zierler, Samuel A. Bozzette, Martin F. Shapiro

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: Gynecologic disease is common in HIV-infected women. The authors examine the sociodemographic, clinical, and provider factors associated with the care of women with vaginal symptoms. METHODS: Women enrolled in the HIV Cost and Services Utilization Study (HCSUS), a nationally representative probability sample of HIV-infected adults, were interviewed between January 1996 and April 1997. Women with vaginal symptoms who sought medical attention were asked, Did your health care provider examine your vaginal area? Women were also asked if they received medication for their symptoms. RESULTS: Among 154 women with vaginal symptoms, 127 sought care for their symptoms. Of those who sought care, 48% saw a gynecologist and 52% sought care from nongynecologists, most often their usual HIV care provider. Women who saw a gynecologist for their symptoms were more likely to have received a pelvic examination (92% versus 76%; p =.06) and vaginal fluid collection (98% versus 88%; p =.06) than those who saw their regular HIV provider. Fifteen percent of women received medication for their symptoms without having a pelvic examination; gynecologists were less likely to prescribe without an examination (8% versus 21%; p =.12). CONCLUSION: Gynecologists are more likely to provide adequate care of vaginal symptoms among HIV-infected women than nongynecologists who were HIV care providers. This specialty difference is consistent with quality of care studies for other medical conditions, but the potential gynecologic complications of inadequate evaluation and treatment warrants further investigation.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.