Two field experts discuss whether evidence of a medical cost offset exists. It's a simple question that has generated a complex debate in the behavioral health field: Does behavioral health treatment generate savings in other healthcare expenditures? Those who say yes point to the high costs of emergency care and other treatment associated with undetected depression or substance use. Those who say no insist that behavioral health leaders have overestimated treatment's medical cost offset in a far-reaching attempt to win more funding. And still others wonder about the question's appropriateness: Would a cancer surgeon be asked to justify his services by discussing how they save money in other healthcare areas?
This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.