Randomized Testing of Alternative Survey Formats Using Anonymous Volunteers on the World Wide Web

Published in: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, v. 8, no. 6, Nov. 2001, p. 616-620

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2001

by Douglas S. Bell, Carol Mangione, Charles E. Kahn, Jr.

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.jamia.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Consenting visitors to a health survey Web site were randomly assigned to a matrix presentation or an expanded presentation of survey response options. Among 4,208 visitors to the site over 3 months, 1,615 (38 percent) participated by giving consent and completing the survey. During a pre-trial period, when consent was not required, 914 of 1,667 visitors (55 percent) participated (odds ratio 1.9, P<0.0001). Mean response times were 5.07 minutes for the matrix format and 5.22 minutes for the expanded format (P=0.16). Neither health status scores nor alpha reliability coefficients were substantially influenced by the survey format, but health status scores varied with age and gender as expected from U.S. population norms. In conclusion, presenting response options in a matrix format may not substantially speed survey completion. This study demonstrates a method for rapidly evaluating interface design alternatives using anonymous Web volunteers who have provided informed consent.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.