Underuse of Primary Mycobacterium Avium Complex and Pneumocystis Carinii Prophylaxis in the United States

Published in: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, v. 28, no. 4, Dec. 1, 2001, p. 340-344

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2001

by Steven M. Asch, Allen Gifford, Samuel A. Bozzette, Barbara J. Turner, W. Christopher Mathews, Kiyoshi Kuromiya, William Cunningham, Ronald Andersen, Martin F. Shapiro, Afshin Rastegar, et al.

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.jaids.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the rates of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Pneumocystis carinii (PCP) prophylaxis adherence to guidelines and how they have changed after introduction of effective antiretroviral therapy. OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of primary prophylaxis for MAC and PCP and to evaluate the influence of sociodemographic characteristics, region, and provider experience. DESIGN: National probability sample cohort of HIV patients in care. SETTING: One hundred sixty HIV health care providers. PATIENTS: A total of 2864 patients interviewed in 1996 to 1997 (68% response) and 2267 follow-up interviews, representing 65% of surviving sampled patients (median follow-up, 15.1 months). MEASUREMENTS: Use of prophylactic drugs, most recent CD4 count, sociodemographics, and regional and total HIV patients/providers. RESULTS: Of patients eligible for primary MAC prophylaxis (most recent CD4 count <50/mm 3 ), 41% at baseline and 40% at follow-up patients were treated. Of patients eligible for primary PCP prophylaxis (i.e., those with CD4 counts <200/mm 3 ), 64% and 72% were treated, respectively. MAC prophylaxis at baseline was less likely in African American (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.59), Hispanic (OR, 27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94) and less-educated (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.36-1.0) patients and more likely in U. S. geographic regions in the Pacific West (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.0-23) and Midwest (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.2-33) and in practices with more HIV patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most eligible patients did not receive MAC prophylaxis; PCP prophylaxis rates were better but still suboptimal. Our results support outreach efforts to African Americans, Hispanics, the less educated, and those in the northeastern United States and in practices with fewer HIV patients.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.