The Possibilities and Boundaries of Appropriateness Using the RAND/UCLA Method

Published in: Drug Research / Arzneimittel-Forschung, v. 52, no. 4, 2002, p. 18-19

Posted on on January 01, 2002

by James P. Kahan

In this article, the author describes the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM), which combines scientific evidence with expert judgment to assess the appropriateness of care for specific procedures applied to specific patients. Determining appropriateness is one way that western industrialized countries can face the challenge of developing an affordable health care system while preserving quality of care.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.