The Effects of Primary Care Depression Treatment on Patients' Clinical Status and Employment

Published in: Health Services Research, v. 37, no. 5, Oct. 2002, p. 1145-1158

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2002

by Michael Schoenbaum, Jurgen Unutzer, Daniel F. McCaffrey, Naihua Duan, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Kenneth B. Wells

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.blackwell-synergy.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of depression treatment in primary care on patients' clinical status and employment, over six months. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Data are from a randomized controlled trial of quality improvement for depression that included 938 adults with depressive disorder in 46 managed primary care clinics in five states. STUDY DESIGN: Observational analysis of the effects of evidence-based depression care over six months on health outcomes and employment. Selection into treatment is accounted for using instrumental variables techniques, with randomized assignment to the quality improvement intervention as the identifying instrument. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Patient-reported clinical status, employment, health care use, and personal characteristics; health care use and costs from claims data. Principal Findings. At six months, patients with appropriate care, compared to those without it, had lower rates of depressive disorder (24 percent versus 70 percent), better mental health-related quality of life, and higher rates of employment (72 percent versus 53 percent), each po.05. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate treatment for depression provided in community-based primary care substantially improves clinical and quality of life outcomes and employment. Key Words. Depression, effectiveness, instrumental variables, employment

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.