Observational Studies and Evidence-Based Practice

Can't Live with Them, Can't Live Without Them

Ian D. Coulter

ResearchPosted on rand.org Mar 1, 2003Published in: Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, v. 3, no. 1, Mar. 2003, p. 1-4

Role in Health Care, Stroup et al. define an observational study as "an etiologic or effectiveness study using data from an existing database, a cross-sectional study, a case series, a case-control design, a design with historical controls, or a cohort design." Generally, there are several major problems with the use of observational studies in systematic reviews of evidence for a treatment procedure. The first is that since all observational studies lack randomization, true assessment of efficacy is not possible. Furthermore, it is not possible to determine what biases may have influenced the results, both from the provider and the patient. Analytically, results from observational studies either cannot be pooled for a meta-analyses or can be done so only with caution.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2003
  • Document Number: EP-200303-27

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.