Physician Specialization and Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV

Adoption and Use in a National Probability Sample of Persons Infected with HIV

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine, v. 18, no. 4, Apr. 2003, p. 233-241

Posted on RAND.org on December 31, 2002

by Bruce E. Landon, Ira B. Wilson, Susan E. Cohn, Carl J. Fichtenbaum, Mitchell D. Wong, Neil S. Wenger, Samuel A. Bozzette, Martin F. Shapiro, Paul Cleary

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.blackwell-synergy.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the first protease inhibitor in January 1996, there has been a dramatic change in the treatment of persons infected with HIV. The changing nature of HIV care has important implications for the types of physicians that can best care for patients with HIV infection. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of specialty training and experience in the care of HIV disease with the adoption and use of highly active antiretroviral (ARV) therapy (HAART). DESIGN: Observational cohort study of patients under care for HIV infection and their physicians. PATIENTS AND SETTING: This analysis used data collected from a national probability sample of noninstitutionalized persons with HIV infection participating in the HIV Costs and Service Utilization Study and their primary physicians. The authors analyzed 1,820 patients being cared for by 374 physicians. MEASUREMENTS: Rates of HAART use at 12 months and 18 months after the approval of the first protease inhibitor. RESULTS: Forty percent of the physicians were formally trained in infectious diseases (ID), 38% were general medicine physicians with self-reported expertise in the care of HIV, and 22% were general medicine physicians without self-reported expertise in the care of HIV. The majority of physicians (69%) reported a current HIV caseload of 50 patients or more. In multivariable models controlling for patient characteristics, there were no differences between generalist experts and ID physicians in rates of HAART use in December 1996. When compared to ID physicians, however, patients being treated by non-expert general medicine physicians were less likely to be on HAART (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.17 to 0.61). Patients being treated by low-volume physicians were also much less likely to be on HAART therapy than those treated by high-volume physicians (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.48). These findings were attenuated by June 1997, suggesting that over time, the broader physician community successfully adopted HAART therapy. This finding is consistent with prior research on the diffusion of innovations. CONCLUSIONS: Similar proportions of patients treated by expert generalists and ID specialists were on appropriate HAART therapy by December 1996 and July 1997. Patients treated by non-expert generalists, most of whom were the lowest-volume physicians, were much less likely to be on appropriate ARV therapy in the earlier time period. Our findings demonstrate that expert generalists who develop specialized expertise are able to provide care of quality comparable to that of specialists.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.