Psychiatric Comorbidity

Is More Less?

Published in: World Psychiatry, v. 3, no. 1, Feb. 2004, p. 18-23

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2004

by Harold Alan Pincus, James D. Tew, Jr., Michael B. First

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.masson.it

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

With each successive revision of the DSM and ICD, psychiatric comorbidity has become more prevalent. The 'atheoretical' approaches of the DSM and ICD explicitly encourage multiple diagnoses with few exclusionary hierarchies, in the hope that all clinically relevant information will be captured. However, the current strategy of diagnosing 'maximal' comorbidity may not reflect 'optimal' comorbidity. Many clinicians and health information systems, particularly those in developing countries, have a limited capacity for capturing this diagnostic information, and fail to characterize additional diagnoses that are present. This article will address the evolution of our current diagnostic system as a way of understanding the emergence of comorbid psychiatric diagnoses. Alternative diagnostic approaches (a dimensional system, diagnostic hierarchies, and mixed diagnostic categories) that could be used to address the emergence of comorbid psychiatric diagnoses are considered. Future challenges for the next evolution of DSM and ICD are presented.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.