Psychosocial Risks Associated with Multiple Births Resulting from Assisted Reproduction

Published In: Fertility and Sterility, v. 83, no. 5, May 2005, p. 1422-1428

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2005

by Marcia A. Ellison, Selen Hotamisligil, Hang Lee, Janet W. Rich-Edwards, Samuel C. Pang, Janet E. Hall

OBJECTIVE: To determine if increased psychosocial risks are associated with each increase in birth multiplicity (i.e., singleton, twin, triplet) resulting from assisted reproduction. DESIGN: Stratified random sample (n = 249). SETTING: An academic teaching hospital and private practice infertility center. PATIENT(s): Mothers raising 1- to 4-year-old children (n = 128 singletons, n = 111 twins, and n = 10 triplets) conceived through assisted reproduction. INTERVENTION(s): Self-administered, mailed survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(s): Scales measuring material needs, quality of life, social stigma, depression, stress, and marital satisfaction. RESULT(s): Using multivariate logistic regression models, for each additional multiple birth child, the odds of having difficulty meeting basic material needs more than tripled and the odds of lower quality of life and increased social stigma more than doubled. Each increase in multiplicity was also associated with increased risks of maternal depression. CONCLUSION(s): To increase patients' informed decision-making, assisted reproduction providers might consider incorporating a discussion of these risks with all patients before they begin fertility treatment, and holding the discussion again if the treatment results in a multiple gestation. These data may also help providers to identify appropriate counseling, depression screening, and supports for patients with multiple births.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.