Cover: Provider Type and Depression Treatment Adequacy

Provider Type and Depression Treatment Adequacy

Published in: Health Policy, v. 72, no. 3, June 2005, p. 321-332

Posted on 2005

by Thomas J. Kniesner, Regina H. Powers, Thomas Croghan

The authors investigate the effect of initial provider (psychiatrist versus primary care physician or non-physician mental health specialist) on the adequacy of subsequent treatment for persons with depression. Our data are from MarketScan, a medical and pharmacy insurance claims database, which they use to estimate models of the likelihood of treatment for depression and the likelihood that any anti-depression treatments received are adequate. Patients initially seeing psychiatrists are most likely to receive adequate treatment. Provider type has a statistically and medically significant effect on whether any treatment occurs but a smaller effect on treatment adequacy among treated patients. Our results show the importance of provider type in treatment patterns, but the effects on patient outcomes are yet to be determined definitively.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.