Cover: Methodological Approaches for a Systematic Review of End-of-Life Care

Methodological Approaches for a Systematic Review of End-of-Life Care

Published In: Journal of Palliative Medicine, v. 8, Suppl. 1, Dec. 2005, p. S-4-S-11

Posted on 2005

by Karl Lorenz, Joanne Lynn, Sally C. Morton, Sydney Dy, Lisa R. Shugarman, Anne Wilkinson, Richard A. Mularski, Virginia C. Sun, Ronda G. Hughes, Shannon Rhodes, et al.

As background for a National Institutes of Health State of the Science Conference on End-of-Life-Care, the authors performed a systematic review of end-of-life care and outcomes. The systematic review was intended to evaluate the evidence in the field from the perspective of concerns important to patients, caregivers, and the health care system. This article relates the challenges in performing a systematic review of end-of-life care and outcomes, and describes the methods that the authors used to define the scope, search the literature, develop exclusion and inclusion criteria, incorporate various types of articles, and synthesize the results. Major challenges to conducting a review included the need to define end of life, clarify a conceptual framework of outcomes including definitions of terms and the relationships among terms, and determine specific goals for the review. The review identified 24,423 total citations, of which 911 comprised the final set used for the evidence report. This very large, diverse body of literature reflects the tremendous growth of the field of end-of-life care over the last decade.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.