Methodological Approaches for a Systematic Review of End-of-Life Care

Published In: Journal of Palliative Medicine, v. 8, Suppl. 1, Dec. 2005, p. S-4-S-11

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2005

by Karl Lorenz, Joanne Lynn, Sally C. Morton, Sydney Dy, Lisa R. Shugarman, Anne Wilkinson, Richard A. Mularski, Virginia C. Sun, Ronda G. Hughes, Shannon Rhodes, et al.

Read More

Access further information on this document at online.liebertpub.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

As background for a National Institutes of Health State of the Science Conference on End-of-Life-Care, the authors performed a systematic review of end-of-life care and outcomes. The systematic review was intended to evaluate the evidence in the field from the perspective of concerns important to patients, caregivers, and the health care system. This article relates the challenges in performing a systematic review of end-of-life care and outcomes, and describes the methods that the authors used to define the scope, search the literature, develop exclusion and inclusion criteria, incorporate various types of articles, and synthesize the results. Major challenges to conducting a review included the need to define end of life, clarify a conceptual framework of outcomes including definitions of terms and the relationships among terms, and determine specific goals for the review. The review identified 24,423 total citations, of which 911 comprised the final set used for the evidence report. This very large, diverse body of literature reflects the tremendous growth of the field of end-of-life care over the last decade.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.