Revalidation of the Original Cedars-Sinai Health-Related Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis Questionnaire

Published in: Journal of Rheumatology, v. 33, no. 2, Feb. 2006, p. 256-262

Posted on on January 01, 2006

by Chiun-Fang Chiou, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Izzy Cornelio, Deborah P. Lubeck, H. E. Paulus, Michelle Dylan, Michael Weisman

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric characteristics of the original 33-item Cedars-Sinai Health-Related Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis Questionnaire (O-CSHQ-RA) and 11-item CSHQ-RA Short Form (SF) using a representative population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from 55 sites across the United States. METHODS: Data were from a 24-week multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of 312 RA patients receiving anakinra. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to indicate the internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was assessed by establishing the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for screening and baseline visit responses. Convergent validity was tested with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Analysis of variance was performed to determine discriminant validity. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and analysis of covariance were used to assess the responsiveness. A discriminant function was generated to determine the clinically meaningful change. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was demonstrated for both versions of the CSHQ-RA, with ICC ranging from 0.82 to 0.94. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were = 0.9, indicating good internal consistency. Pearson correlations between health-related quality of life instruments and CSHQ-RA measures ranged from -0.33 to -0.73 and 0.39 to 0.76, demonstrating good convergent validity. Scores on both versions of the CSHQ-RA differed significantly (p < 0.0001) for patients with different levels of physical disability as measured by the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Both instruments were responsive to differences in patient health as measured by the general health question (p < 0.0001). Clinically meaningful changes were calculated for all 5 domains of the O-CSHQ-RA (6.9-14.0) and the overall O-CSHQ-RA SF (12.7). CONCLUSION: These results support the validity and reliability of both the original CSHQ-RA and the 11-item CSHQ-RA SF when tested in a representative patient population.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.