SB1953 and the Challenge of Hospital Seismic Safety in California

Published in: California HealthCare Foundation (Oakland, CA : 2006)

Posted on on December 31, 2005

by Charles Meade, Jonathan Kulick

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Funded by the California Healthcare Foundation, RAND has updated its analysis of the costs and policy issues surrounding implementation of California SB1953, the state law governing seismic safety for all acute care hospitals. Under the law's requirements, approximately 50% of California hospital buildings must be replaced or substantially strengthened by 2030. For this analysis, we have collected updated construction cost data, and comprehensive information on the status of hospital construction projects. We have also discussed the hospital construction planning process with a number of stakeholders in California, and we have reviewed new design trends for California healthcare facilities. Based on the above, we conclude that approximately half of the required hospitals will not be compliant with the initial deadlines for SB1953 in 2008 and 2013, and many may not meet the final deadline in 2030. Because of recent construction cost inflation and changes in the design for modern healthcare facilities, we estimate total construction costs for SB1953 that are significantly higher than our previous report. Depending on future inflation trends and construction planning decisions by individual hospitals, the total costs could range between $45-$110 billion in 2006 dollars, compared to our previous estimate of $41.7 billon in 2002. Our current estimate does not include the contributions from financing costs, which could increase the total by as much as a factor of 2, depending on the financing arrangements. At these levels, construction for SB1953 compliance could translate to significant increases in health care costs, though there are large uncertainties in the absolute magnitudes and the ultimate bearer of these costs. Considering these results, we conclude that a key questions for the SB1953 policy debate will focus on the appropriate time scales to achieve California's seismic safety goals.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.