What the Resident Meant to Say

Use of Cognitive Interviewing Techniques to Develop Questionnaires for Nursing Home Residents

Published in: The Gerontologist, v. 48, no. 2, Apr. 2008, p. 158-169

Posted on RAND.org on December 31, 2007

by Patricia Housen, George R. Shannon, Barbara Simon, Maria Orlando Edelen, Mary P. Cadogan, Linda Sohn, Malia Jones, Joan L. Buchanan, Debra Saliba

Read More

Access further information on this document at gerontologist.gerontologyjournals.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

PURPOSE: Emphasis on consumer-centered care for frail and institutionalized older adults has increased the development and adaptation of surveys for this population. Conventional methods used to pretest survey items fail to investigate underlying sources of measurement error. However, the use of the cognitive interview (CI), a method for studying how respondents answer survey items, is not well established or documented in this population. This study demonstrates how CIs can be used to improve questionnaires intended for nursing home residents. DESIGN AND METHODS: CIs were conducted with 29 nursing home residents in order to identify potential problems with prospective survey items. The authors scripted probes to standardize the interviews and adapted the Question Appraisal System to enumerate and classify the problems discovered. RESULTS: The authors fielded between one and five versions of each item in an iterative process that identified 61 item-specific problems. Additionally, residents' cognitive responses suggested that some screened their answers on the basis of perceived physical and environmental limitations, and some had difficulty answering items about preferences that fluctuate day to day. These findings led us to modify the items and response set to simplify the respondents' cognitive task. IMPLICATIONS: This study illustrates how CI techniques can be used to understand residents' comprehension of and response to survey items.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.