Using Community Arts Events to Enhance Collective Efficacy and Community Engagement to Address Depression in an African American Community

Published In: American Journal of Public Health, v. 99, no. 2, Feb. 2009, p. 237-233

Posted on on January 01, 2009

by Bowen Chung, Loretta Jones, Andrea Jones, Charles Edward Corbett, Theodore Booker, Kenneth B. Wells, Barry E. Collins

Read More

Access further information on this document at American Public Health Association

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: The authors used community-partnered participatory research (CPPR) to measure collective efficacy and its role as a precursor of community engagement to improve depression care in the African American community of South Los Angeles. METHODS: The authors collected survey data from participants at arts events sponsored by a CPPR workgroup. Both exploratory (photography exhibit; n = 747) and confirmatory (spoken word presentations; n = 104) structural equation models were developed to examine how knowledge and attitudes toward depression influenced community engagement. RESULTS: In all models, collective efficacy to improve depression care independently predicted community engagement in terms of addressing depression (B = 0.64-0.97; P < .001). Social stigma was not significantly associated with collective efficacy or community engagement. In confirmatory analyses, exposure to spoken word presentations and previous exposure to CPPR initiatives increased perceived collective efficacy to improve depression care (B = 0.19-0.24; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing collective efficacy to improve depression care may be a key component of increasing community engagement to address depression. CPPR events may also increase collective efficacy. Both collective efficacy and community engagement are relevant constructs in the South Los Angeles African American community.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.