Integrating Expected Coverage and Local Reliability for Emergency Medical Services Location Problems

Paul Sorensen, Richard Church

ResearchPosted on rand.org 2010Published in: Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v. 44, no. 1, Mar. 2010, p. 8-18

Daskin's, The Maximum Expected Covering Location Problem (MEXCLP) model was one of the first efforts to capture the stochastic nature of emergency medical services (EMS) location problems within a mixed-integer formulation. With their subsequent introduction of MALP, Maximum Availability Location Problem, offered two key advances, local vehicle busyness estimates and the x-reliability objective. While these constructs have influenced many subsequent EMS location models, they have been subjected to relatively little empirical analysis. To address this, we introduce the LR-MEXCLP, a hybrid model combining the local busyness estimates of MALP with the maximum coverage objective of MEXCLP. We then solve a series of problems with all three models and employ simulation to estimate aggregate service levels. We find that LR-MEXCLP leads to modest but consistent service gains over both MALP and MEXCLP. These results support the merits of local busyness estimates, but they also suggest that the x-reliability objective may be inappropriate when seeking to maximize aggregate system response capabilities. More generally, our research underscores the utility of (a) linking modeling assumptions and goals with real-world application contexts, and (b) employing simulation or other techniques to validate theoretical results.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 2010
  • Pages: 11
  • Document Number: EP-201000-119

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.