A Preliminary Investigation Into Whether Attentional Bias Influences Mood Outcomes Following Emotional Disclosure

Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, v. 17, no. 3, Sep. 2010. p. 195-206

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2010

by Kavita Vedhara, Heather Brant, Elias Adamopolous, Lucy Byrne-Davis, Bundy Mackintosh, Laura Hoppitt, Martin Tovee, Jeremy N. V. Miles, James W. Pennebaker

Read More

Access further information on this document at International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable interest in factors which may influence the efficacy of emotional disclosure. To date, a range of demographic and psychological variables have been considered. However, consideration has not yet been given to cognitive factors known to influence emotional processing such as attentional bias (AB). PURPOSE: We present the results from an exploratory study examining the role of AB in influencing mood outcomes following emotional disclosure. METHOD: Individuals with negative and avoidant ABs (i.e., individuals vigilant for and individuals avoidant of negative emotional material, respectively) were identified by asking 105 individuals to complete a standardized AB task. Individuals in the bottom quartile of AB scores were categorized as having a negative AB and individuals in the top quartile were categorized as having an avoidant AB. These participants (n=38) completed the emotional disclosure intervention and mood was assessed at 1, 4, and 8 weeks post-intervention. RESULTS: Negative AB individuals showed greater improvements in depression, anger, fatigue, and total mood disturbance. These results were unrelated to alexithymia. CONCLUSION: These results provide preliminary support for the proposal that AB may influence the effects of emotional disclosure on mood.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.