A Markov Decision Process to Dynamically Match Hospital Inpatient Staffing to Demand

Published in: IIE Transactions on Health Systems Engineering, v. 1, no. 2, Oct. 2011, p. 116-130

Posted on RAND.org on October 01, 2011

by James R. Broyles, Jeffery K. Cochran, Douglas C. Montgomery

Read More

Access further information on this document at IIE Transactions on Health Systems Engineering

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Appropriate inpatient staffing levels minimize hospital cost and increase patient safety. Hospital inpatient units dynamically adjust premium staffing (above base staffing) levels by attempting to match their daily demand. Historically, inpatient managers subjectively adjust daily staffing from observing the morning inpatient inventory. Inpatient units strive to match staff with demand in a complex patient throughput environment where service rates and non-stationary profiles are not explicitly known. Related queue control and throughput modeling literature do not directly match staffing with demand, require explicit service process knowledge, and are not formulated for an inpatient unit. This paper presents a Markov decision process (MDP) for dynamic inpatient staffing. The MDP explicitly attempts to match staffing with demand, has a statistical discrete time Markov chain foundation that estimates the service process, predicts transient inventory, and is formulated for an inpatient unit. Lastly, the MDP application to a telemetry unit reveals a computational myopic, an approximate stationary, and a finite horizon optimal policy that is validated through hospital expert experience. The application reveals difficult-to-staff inventory levels and shows that the removal of discharge seasonality can drastically decrease required size of the premium staffing pool and the probability of full occupancy thus improving the inpatient unit's patient flow.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.