Development of the Two-Stage Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry

Published in: Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, v. 39, no. 5, Oct. 2011, p. 474–480

Posted on on October 01, 2011

by Brian D. Stucky, Jessica Y. Lee, Shoou-Yih D. Lee, R. Gary Rozier

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: This work proposes a revision of the 30 item Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry (REALD-30), into a more efficient and easier-to-use two-stage scale. METHODS: Using a sample of 1405 individuals (primarily women) enrolled in a Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), the present work utilizes principles of item response theory and multi-stage testing to revise the REALD-30 into a two-stage test of oral health literacy, named Two-Stage REALD or TS-REALD, which maximizes score precision at various levels of participant ability. RESULTS: Based on the participant's score on the five-item first-stage (i.e., routing test), one of three potential stage-two tests is administered: a four-item Low Literacy test, a six-item Average Literacy test, or a three-item High Literacy test. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of scores for the TS-REALD is >0.85 for a wide range of ability. The TS-REALD was found to be predictive of perceived impact of oral conditions on well-being, after controlling for educational level, overall health, dental health, and a general health literacy measure. While containing approximately one-third of the items on the original scale, the TS-REALD was found to maintain similar psychometric qualities.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.