Understanding the Decisions and Values of Stakeholders in Health Information Exchanges

Experiences from Massachusetts

Published In: American Journal of Public Health, v. 99, no. 5, May 2009, p. 950-955

Posted on RAND.org on May 01, 2009

by Robert S. Rudin, Steven Simon, Lynn A Volk, Mickey Tripathi, David W. Bates

Read More

Access further information on this document at ajph.aphapublications.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: We studied how health information exchange systems are established by examining the decisions (and thus, indirectly, the values) of key stakeholders (health care providers) participating in a health information exchange pilot project in 3 Massachusetts communities. Our aim was to understand how these kinds of information exchanges can be made viable. METHODS: We used semistructured interviews to assess health care providers' decision-making processes in selecting technical architectures and vendors for the pilot projects to uncover their needs, expectations, and motivations. RESULTS: Our interviews indicated that, after extensive evaluations, health care providers in all 3 communities eventually selected a hybrid architecture that included a central data repository. However, the reasons for selecting this architecture varied considerably among the 3 communities, reflecting their particular values. Plans to create a community patient portal also differed across communities. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, to become established, health information exchange efforts must foster trust, appeal to strategic interests of the medical community as a whole, and meet stakeholder expectations of benefits from quality measurements and population health interventions. If health information exchange organizations cannot address these factors, sustainability will remain precarious.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.