Zenith-sky Observations of Stratospheric Gases

The Sensitivity of Air Mass Factors to Geophysical Parameters and the Influence of Tropospheric Clouds

Published In: Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, v. 68, no. 6, Mar. 2001, p. 657-677

Posted on RAND.org on March 01, 2001

by Matt Bassford, Chris A. McLinden, Kimberly Strong

Read More

Access further information on this document at Elsevier

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The retrieval of accurate vertical column amounts of stratospheric constituents from zenith-sky spectroscopy is dependent on accurately modeling the transfer of radiation through the atmosphere and calculating suitable air mass factors (AMFs). Using a vector radiative transfer (RT) model we evaluate potential error sources in the AMF calculation, arising from incorrect geophysical parameters and computational approximations. Ozone and NO2 AMFs were calculated using 19 different parameterizations, whereupon each was used to retrieve vertical column information from zenith-sky spectra recorded at a mid-latitude location. When the model was run with single-order scattering only, the derived AMFs were between 2 and 5% lower than those calculated using a multiple scattering scheme. Multiple scattering was also found to act in tandem with other parameters investigated, for example volcanic sulfate aerosols and surface albedo, and as such, we conclude that it is important to include multiple scattering in any RT model. Significant errors were also introduced by using a standard ozone profile rather than one derived from ozonesonde data. Substantially amplified AMFs were obtained from model runs that contained tropospheric clouds. Zenith-sky measurements recorded during cloudy conditions demonstrated that AMFs calculated from an RT model that neglects scattering by tropospheric clouds are unsuitable for analysis of spectra from overcast days. The feasibility of calculating AMFs tailored to account for the presence of clouds is also discussed.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.