Early HIV Treatment Led to Life Expectancy Gains Valued at $80 Billion for People Infected in 1996-2009

Published In: Health Affairs, v. 33, no. 3, Mar. 2014, p. 370-377

Posted on RAND.org on March 01, 2014

by John A. Romley, Timothy Juday, Matthew D. Solomon, Daniel Seekins, Ronald Brookmeyer, Dana P. Goldman

Read More

Access further information on this document at Project HOPE

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Question

  1. What are the gains in life expectancy for HIV-positive individuals who initiated combination antiretroviral therapy early, as recommended by revised U.S. treatment guidelines?

In late 2009 US guidelines for HIV treatment were revised to recommend the initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) earlier in the course of the disease. We analyzed the life expectancy gains of people infected with HIV between the introduction of cART in 1996 and the 2009 guideline revisions. Compared to people who initiated cART late (defined as having a CD4 cell count of less than 350 per cubic millimeter of blood), those who initiated treatment early (with a CD4 count of 350–500) could expect to live 6.1 years longer, and the earliest initiators (with a CD4 count of more than 500) could expect an extra 9.0 years of life. The total value of life expectancy gains to the early and earliest initiators of treatment was $80 billion, with each life-year valued at $150,000. The value of the survival gains was more than double the increase in drug manufacturers' revenues from early cART initiation. Our results clarify the economic implications of adherence to treatment guidelines.

Key Findings

  • Those who began treatment slightly earlier in the course of the disease than had previously been recommended would gain 6.1 years of life.
  • The earliest treatment initiators would gain nine years.
  • The total value of the life years gained for these groups was $80 billion.
  • Adherence to treatment guidelines can generate substantial economic value.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.