Combat Experience and Problem Drinking in Veterans

Exploring the Roles of PTSD, Coping Motives, and Perceived Stigma

Published in: Addictive Behaviors, v. 66, Mar. 2017, p. 90-95

Posted on on December 09, 2016

by Stephen Miller, Eric R. Pedersen, Grant N. Marshall

Read More

Access further information on this document at Addictive Behaviors

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Research Questions

  1. In young adult veterans, what are the associations between adverse alcohol consequences, combat exposure, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms?
  2. How does the behavior of drinking to cope, or perceived stigma to seeking help, affect these associations?

PURPOSE: The current investigation sought to illustrate the etiology of adverse alcohol consequences in young adult veterans using a path analytic framework. METHODS: A total of 312 veterans aged 19–34 were enrolled in a larger intervention study on alcohol use. At baseline, participants completed measures of combat severity, PTSD symptom severity, and drinking motives to cope. At one month follow-up, participants completed measures of perceived stigma of behavioral health treatment seeking and past 30-day alcohol consequences. RESULTS: After entering the covariates of age, gender, race/ethnicity, and past year behavioral health treatment utilization, a path analytic model demonstrated a good fit to the data predicting alcohol consequences in this population. Further, a separate exploratory analysis confirmed that both drinking motives to cope and perceived stigma of behavioral health treatment seeking mediated the link between PTSD symptom severity and alcohol consequences. CONCLUSIONS: The current model expands upon prior research showing the relationship between combat severity and alcohol use behavior in young adult veterans. Results support the notion that veterans with PTSD symptoms may drink to cope and that perceived stigma surrounding help seeking may further contribute to alcohol related problems.

Key Findings

  • A path analytic framework found a relationship between combat severity and PTSD severity.
  • The framework also found a relationship between PTSD and both drinking motives to cope and perceived stigma of seeking treatment, as well as a relationship between alcohol consequence and drinking motives and perceived stigma.
  • Together, these findings suggest that both drinking to cope and perceived stigma explain the previously identified link between PTSD and alcohol consequences among young adult veterans.
  • The link between PTSD and coping motives was the strongest relationship observed, suggesting that these motives may explain why some young veterans may be more likely than others to encounter adverse consequence from their heavy drinking.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.