Foundations of Activity of Daily Living Trajectories of Older Americans

Published in: The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, v. 72, no. 1, January 2017, p. 129-139

Posted on on January 27, 2017

by Linda G. Martin, Zachary Zimmer, Jinkook Lee

Read More

Access further information on this document at The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: The disablement process can be viewed conceptually as a progression from disease to impairment to functional limitation and finally disability (frequently operationalized as activity limitation). This article assesses the extent to which early phases of the process are associated with individual-level disability trajectories by age.  METHOD: We use data from seven waves of the Health and Retirement Study, 1998 to 2010, to investigate for individuals aged 65–84 years how baseline sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported disease, pain, and functional limitation (physical, cognitive, or sensory) are related to the dynamics of limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs). Our modeling approach jointly estimates multiperiod trajectories of ADL limitation and mortality and yields estimates of the number of, shapes of, and factors associated with the most common trajectories.  RESULTS: Individual probability of ADL limitation can best be described by three common trajectories. In comparison with disease, pain, and functional limitation, sociodemographic characteristics have weak associations with trajectory group membership. Notably, neither sex nor education is strongly associated with group membership in multivariate models.  DISCUSSION: The analysis confirms the importance of the early phases of the disablement process and their relationships with subsequent trajectories of activity limitation.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.