The NHS Health Check programme, introduced in 2009, is the largest current prevention initiative in England. Literature which evaluates the first eight years of the NHS Health Checks programme, has been published. Although literature on the NHS Health Checks programme during its first eight years was published, no evidence synthesis had been conducted during that period. In 2016, Public Health England commissioned the Primary Care Unit at the University of Cambridge and RAND Europe to conduct an independent rapid evidence synthesis of the NHS Health Check programme. The evidence synthesis focused on the delivery, experience, uptake, attendance and health outcomes of NHS Health Check programme. We produced a descriptive quantitative synthesis and a thematic qualitative synthesis of the data.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.