A World Health Organization Field Trial Assessing a Proposed ICD-11 Framework for Classifying Patient Safety Events

Published in: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Volume 29, Issue 4, 1 August 2017, Pages 548-556. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx070

Posted on RAND.org on October 12, 2017

by Alan J. Forster, Burnand Bernard, Saskia E. Drösler, Yana Gurevich, James Harrison, Jean-Marie Januel, Patrick Romano, Danielle A. Southern, Vijaya Sundararajan, Hude Quan, et al.

Read More

Access further information on this document at International Journal for Quality in Health Care

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Objective

To assess the utility of the proposed World Health Organization (WHO)'s International Classification of Disease (ICD) framework for classifying patient safety events.

Setting

Independent classification of 45 clinical vignettes using a web-based platform.

Study Participants

The WHO's multi-disciplinary Quality and Safety Topic Advisory Group.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

The framework consists of three concepts: harm, cause and mode. We defined a concept as 'classifiable' if more than half of the raters could assign an ICD-11 code for the case. We evaluated reasons why cases were nonclassifiable using a qualitative approach.

Results

Harm was classifiable in 31 of 45 cases (69%). Of these, only 20 could be classified according to cause and mode. Classifiable cases were those in which a clear cause and effect relationship existed (e.g. medication administration error). Nonclassifiable cases were those without clear causal attribution (e.g. pressure ulcer). Of the 14 cases in which harm was not evident (31%), only 5 could be classified according to cause and mode and represented potential adverse events. Overall, nine cases (20%) were nonclassifiable using the three-part patient safety framework and contained significant ambiguity in the relationship between healthcare outcome and putative cause.

Conclusions

The proposed framework enabled classification of the majority of patient safety events. Cases in which potentially harmful events did not cause harm were not classifiable; additional code categories within the ICD-11 are one proposal to address this concern. Cases with ambiguity in cause and effect relationship between healthcare processes and outcomes remain difficult to classify.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.