2005 RAND Annual Report

Credibility Amidst Controversy

Published Jun 8, 2006

We would be remiss in our duties if we avoided controversial issues. We would be equally remiss if we addressed those issues in ways that consistently favored one ideology or partisan faction over another. We are at our best when we deliver objective information that offers all political camps a common point of departure from which they can, if they choose, work toward mutually beneficial solutions.

Many of our finest accomplishments in 2005 resulted from our ability to address controversial questions and yet retain our credibility amidst controversy.

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

2005 RAND Annual Report: Credibility Amidst Controversy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2006. https://www.rand.org/pubs/corporate_pubs/CP1-2005.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND corporate publication series. Corporate publications include program or department brochures, newsletters, pamphlets, and miscellaneous information about RAND or RAND's business units.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.