Cancellations and Delays in Completion of Department of Defense A-76 Cost Comparisons

Edward G. Keating

ResearchPublished 1997

The Department of Defense (DoD) has recently increased its use of A-76 public/private cost comparisons. This documented briefing examines the history of A-76 public/private cost comparisons in the DoD using data covering fiscal years 1978-1994. A-76 refers to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circular A-76, which mandates the process for competition for work between government employees and contractors. A fuller understanding of this history may provide insights as to how future cost comparisons might progress as well as suggest possible policy changes to improve future outcomes. It is thought that cost comparisons might reduce infrastructure costs and/or increase military effectiveness. As a note of caution, however, this study finds that since 1978 there have been approximately five A-76 cost comparisons cancelled for every eight completed. Further, those completed have often taken two years or longer to complete. The briefing considers DoD cost comparison background, patterns of cost comparison cancellations, and durations of completed comparisons.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1997
  • Pages: 77
  • Document Number: DB-191-OSD

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Keating, Edward G., Cancellations and Delays in Completion of Department of Defense A-76 Cost Comparisons. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1997. https://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB191.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND documented briefing series. Documented briefings are based on research presented to a client, sponsor, or targeted audience in briefing format. Additional information is provided in the documented briefing in the form of the written narration accompanying the briefing charts.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.