Improving Support to CINC Theater Engagement Plans

Phase I

Roger Allen Brown, Leslie Lewis, John Y. Schrader

ResearchPublished 2001

A briefing on the initial findings from the Phase I study on improving support to the Commander-in-Chief (CINC) Theater Engagement Plans (TEPs). It is concluded that the TEP provides a useful planning mechanism, but it must be more closely linked to DoD formal decisionmaking processes to ensure that engagement activities are considered for resources within DoD planning and programming. The breifing provides an approach for further examination of the engagement mission.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 2001
  • Pages: 64
  • Document Number: DB-323-JS

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Brown, Roger Allen, Leslie Lewis, and John Y. Schrader, Improving Support to CINC Theater Engagement Plans: Phase I. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2001. https://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB323.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This research was conducted within RAND's National Defense Research Institute.

This publication is part of the RAND documented briefing series. Documented briefings are based on research presented to a client, sponsor, or targeted audience in briefing format. Additional information is provided in the documented briefing in the form of the written narration accompanying the briefing charts.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.