Cover: U.S. Strategy in South Vietnam

U.S. Strategy in South Vietnam

Extrication and Equilibrium

Published 1969

by Gerald Cannon Hickey

Download

Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback13 pages $20.00

Failure to appreciate either the political character of revolutionary war or the full effects of U.S. military policy in Vietnam has helped foster conditions favorable to enemy aims that American involvement was originally intended to counter. A prime example: severe disruption of the existing social order in South Vietnam. A wartime boom side by side with mass destruction, near administrative anarchy, and the cultural shock caused by the presence of 700,000 foreigners prompts a doubtful prognosis for the ability of South Vietnam to maintain its equilibrium in the face of U.S. withdrawal unless several ideal political and economic conditions are met. Among others: use of U.S. capital to develop WPA-like programs to absorb the unemployed left in the wake of American extrication.

This report is part of the RAND document series. The RAND Document (D), a product of RAND from 1948 to 1970, was an internal working paper written as a step in a continuing study within RAND, which could be expanded, modified, or withdrawn at any time.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.