Cover: Trends in Punitive Damages

Trends in Punitive Damages

Preliminary Data from Cook County, Illinois, and San Francisco, California

Published 1995

by Deborah R. Hensler, Erik Moller

Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

The Institute for Civil Justice is currently updating its jury verdict database, which includes information on civil jury outcomes, including punitive damage awards, for Cook County, Illinois, and San Francisco, California, for the period 1960-1994. This paper presents the preliminary results of the analyses of trends in punitive damage awards in these state trial court jurisdictions. Changes in the number of awards reflect, in part, changes in the number of cases tried to verdict in each of these jurisdictions; these changes, in turn, reflect changes in court jurisdiction, statutory and case law, and, probably, litigation strategies. Changes in the percentages of cases in which punitive damages were awarded are, therefore, a better indicator of the likelihood of punitive damages being awarded over time. The results suggest that the likelihood of such awards has varied over time, rising significantly during the 1980s, and falling back more recently. They also show that punitive damages are awarded more frequently in some cases than others: from 1960 to 1994, punitive damages were most likely to be awarded in intentional tort cases and business and contract disputes.

This report is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences. The draft could be considered similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts had been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.