Updating Women's Life Course
Theoretical and Methodological Considerations
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||1.7 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
Using Merton's framework of theory and empirical research reciprocity, the authors illustrate the implications of recent empirical innovations in life course methodology for life course theory. The authors focus on three key premises: (1) the life course is dynamic in nature; (2) lives are structured along trajectories and; (3) trajectories are interrelated. The authors present an overview of current life course theory followed by a specific application of Merton's theory of reciprocity. Then they explore and test these premises using several empirical examples with data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. The authors conclude with recommendations for future empirical research and theoretical advances in women's life course.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences. The draft could be considered similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts had been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.